Push Weed Strain
Little, Inc

` Maui ` Maui feminizedsensiseedbank
icular
comparisons may perform such analyses himself from the percentage data presented for each item. Only
slight errors will result from using percentages rather than the raw data I worked from.
Background Variables
The background information on the first page of the questionnaire was used to divide the users into a
number of groups, and every question was subjected to a chi-square analysis for differences in the
distributions among the groups. Only significant (p < .05) differences are presented in the text.
The groups compared were as follows:
Males versus females. Forty-nine percent of the users were men, 27 percent women. The remainder
were not used in male-female comparisons because this question was inadvertently left off some of the
questionnaires.
Older and younger users were defined as those 25 years of age or older versus those from 16 to 24.
Educational Level was compared for the College-educated (at least some college up to and including
bachelor's degree or equivalent) versus the Professionals (graduate training or master's or doctor's
degrees). The users with only a high school education were too few (6 percent) to constitute a group for
valid analysis and so were omitted from the educational level comparison.
Frequency of use of marijuana in the last six months was broken into three groups: the Occasional user
("occasional" or "less than once/month" on the questionnaire), the Weekly user ("once/week or more"),
(3 of 7)4/15/2004 7:05:25 AM
On Being Stoned - Chapter 5
and the Daily user ("almost every day or more"). With a three-way classification, it was found that some
of the frequency and intoxication level categories had to be combined to avoid having too many cells with
low expected frequencies for the chi-square tests,[3] so all analyses with three-way classifications were
done against frequencies of Never, Rarely/Sometimes, and Very Often/Usually. Similarly, levels were
uniformly condensed into Just, Fairly/Strongly, and Very Strongly/Maximum.
Because a given degree of marijuana use in the last six months might mean different things for one user
who Push Weed Strain had followed that pattern for ten years and for another who had used it for just one year, a three-way
analysis was also made for total marijuana use. Categories were Heavy Total users, Moderate Total users,
and Light Total users.
These categories were obtained in the following way. Using the number of uses per
month as a basic unit, the self-rated frequency of use over the user's whole use-history was assigned the
value of 20/month ("almost every day or more"), 8/month ("once/week or more") or 2/month ("once/
month or more" plus "occasionally"). Total length of time in years that the users had used marijuana was
weighted as I for one year or less, 2.25 for three years or less, and 6 for more than three years.
The combinations of these weightings are shown in Table 5-2. They fell into three natural groupings,
which were designated the Heavy (21 icular
comparisons may perform such analyses himself from the percentage data presented for each item. Only
slight errors will result from using percentages rather than the raw data I worked from.
Background Variables
The background information on the first page of the questionnaire was used to divide the users into a
number of groups, and every question was subjected to a chi-square analysis for differences in the
distributions among the groups. Only significant (p < .05) differences are presented in the text.
The groups compared were as follows:
Males versus females. Forty-nine percent of the users were men, 27 percent women. The remainder
were not used in male-female comparisons because this question was inadvertently left off some of the
questionnaires.
Older and younger users were defined as those 25 years of age or older versus those from 16 to 24.
Educational Level was compared for the College-educated (at least some college up to and including
bachelor's degree or equivalent) versus the Professionals (graduate training or master's or doctor's
degrees). The users with only a high school education were too few (6 percent) to constitute a group for
valid analysis and so were omitted from the educational level comparison.
Frequency of use of marijuana in the last six months was broken into three groups: the Occasional user
("occasional" or "less than once/month" on the questionnaire), the Weekly user ("once/week or more"),
(3 of 7)4/15/2004 7:05:25 AM
On Being Stoned - Chapter 5
and the Daily user ("almost every day or more"). With a three-way classification, it was found that some
of the frequency and intoxication level categories had to be combined to avoid having too many cells with
low expected frequencies for the chi-square tests,3] so all analyses with three-way classifications were
done against frequencies of Never, Rarely/Sometimes, and Very Often/Usually. Similarly, levels were
uniformly condensed into Just, Fairly/Strongly, and Very Strongly/Maximum.
Because a given degree of marijuana use in the last six months might mean different things for one user
who had followed that pattern for ten years and for another who had used it for just one year, a three-way
analysis was also made for total marijuana use. Categories were Heavy Total users, Moderate Total users,
and Light Total users. These categories were obtained in the following way. Using the number of uses per
month as a basic unit, the self-rated frequency of use over the user's whole use-history was assigned the
value of 20/month ("almost every day or more"), 8/month ("once/week or more") or 2/month ("once/
month or more" plus "occasionally"). Total length of time in years that the users had used marijuana was
weighted as I for one year or less, 2.25 for three years or less, and 6 for more than three years.
The combinations of these weightings are shown in Table 5-2. They fell into three natural groupings,
which were designated the Heavy (21 icular
comparisons may perform such analyses himself from the percentage data presented for each item. Only
slight errors will result from using percentages rather than the raw data I worked from.
Background Variables
The background information on the first page of the questionnaire was used to divide the users into a
number of groups, and every question was subjected to a chi-square analysis for differences in the
distributions among the groups. Only significant (p < .05) differences are presented in the text.
The groups compared were as follows:
Males versus females.
Forty-nine percent of the users were men, 27 percent women. The remainder
were not used in male-female comparisons because this question was inadvertently left off some of the
questionnaires.
Older and younger users were defined as those 25 years of age or older versus those from 16 to 24.
Educational Level was compared for the College-educated (at least some college up to and including
bachelor's degree or equivalent) versus the Professionals (graduate training or master's or doctor's
degrees). The users with only a high school education were too few (6 percent) to constitute a group for
valid analysis and so were omitted from the educational level comparison.
Frequency of use of marijuana in the last six months was broken into three groups: the Occasional user
("occasional" or "less than once/month" on the questionnaire), the Weekly user ("once/week or more"),
(3 of 7)4/15/2004 7:05:25 AM
On Being Stoned - Chapter 5
and the Daily user ("almost every day or more"). With a three-way classification, it was found that some
of the frequency and intoxication level categories had to be combined to avoid having too many cells with
low expected frequencies for the chi-square tests,3 so all analyses with three-way classifications were
done against frequencies of Never, Rarely/Sometimes, and Very Often/Usually. Similarly, levels were
uniformly condensed into Just, Fairly/Strongly, and Very Strongly/Maximum.
Because a given degree of marijuana use in the last six months might mean different things for one user
who had followed that pattern for ten years and for another who had used it for just one year, a three-way
analysis was also made for total marijuana use. Categories were Heavy Total users, Moderate Total users,
and Light Total users. These categories were obtained in the following way. Using the number of uses per
month as a basic unit, the self-rated frequency of use over the user's whole use-history was assigned the
value of 20/month ("almost every day or more"), 8/month ("once/week or more") or 2/month ("once/
month or more" plus "occasionally"). Total length of time in years that the users had used marijuana was
weighted as I for one year or less, 2.25 for three years or less, and 6 for more than three years.
The combinations of these weightings are shown in Table 5-2. They fell into three natural groupings,
which were designated the Heavy (21 icular
comparisons may perform such analyses himself from the percentage data presented for each item. Only
slight errors will result from using percentages rather than the raw data I worked from.
Background Variables
The background information on the first page of the questionnaire was used to divide the users into a
number of groups, and every question was subjected to a chi-square analysis for differences in the
distributions among the groups.
Only significant (p < .05) differences are presented in the text.
The groups compared were as follows:
Males versus females.
Forty-nine percent of the users were men, 27 percent women. The remainder
were not used in male-female comparisons because this question was inadvertently left off some of the
questionnaires.
Older and younger users were defined as those 25 years of age or older versus those from 16 to 24.
Educational Level was compared for the College-educated (at least some college up to and including
bachelor's degree or equivalent) versus the Professionals (graduate training or master's or doctor's
degrees). The users with only a high school education were too few (6 percent) to constitute a group for
valid analysis and so were omitted from the educational level comparison.
Frequency of use of marijuana in the last six months was broken into three groups: the Occasional user
("occasional" or "less than once/month" on the questionnaire), the Weekly user ("once/week or more"),
(3 of 7)4/15/2004 7:05:25 AM
On Being Stoned - Chapter 5
and the Daily user ("almost every day or more"). With a three-way classification, it was found that some
of the frequency and intoxication level categories had to be combined to avoid having too many cells with
low expected frequencies for the chi-square tests,3 so all analyses with three-way classifications were
done against frequencies of Never, Rarely/Sometimes, and Very Often/Usually. Similarly, levels were
uniformly condensed into Just, Fairly/Strongly, and Very Strongly/Maximum.
Because a given degree of marijuana use in the last six months might mean different things for one user
who had followed that pattern for ten years and for another who had used it for just one year, a three-way
analysis was also made for total marijuana use. Categories were Heavy Total users, Moderate Total users,
and Light Total users. These categories were obtained in the following way. Using the number of uses per
month as a basic unit, the self-rated frequency of use over the user's whole use-history was assigned the
value of 20/month ("almost every day or more"), 8/month ("once/week or more") or 2/month ("once/
month or more" plus "occasionally").
Total length of time in years that the users had used marijuana was
weighted as I for one year or less, 2.25 for three years or less, and 6 for more than three years.
The combinations of these weightings are shown in Table 5-2. They fell into three natural groupings,
which were designated the Heavy (21
For a cash cropper with a lot of free time then it might be a good strain, but the buyers will search for the resin gland
on the budz, it can be a problem for those who sell their crop. If I compare the Kong to the numerous Big Bud
harvests I have seen, there is nothing so special about the yield of the Kong, it is just a very good yielder but
still very unstable judging by those last Kong report we have read lately. So the final thoughts are: No, I would
not buy the Kong for my own personal smoke (potency, buzz and ordinary taste) and No neither I won't use
this strain for a future crop even if the yield was really good, because of the Time/yield factor. But yes, a
newbie would find this strain very interesting and he would be happy to tell his friends that he have had a hell
of a good yield. I can't give the Weight details on the board, but I can say that 4 clones = 1 pound. (Almost
the double weight of the northern light but it took much longer to achieve it though).” – Orchid Man
weed seeds for sale in bham @ 5/21/2012 8:22:47 PM: